If you’re like many Americans, you’ve been told to drink
more water. Many Americans carry reusable plastic water bottles with them from
morning to night, whether working out at the gym or sitting at an office desk
during the workday. We’re told that drinking more water will help us lose
weight, keep our skin clear and give us energy. But new evidence suggests that
those plastic bottles contain chemicals that may actually be harmful to health,
particularly to fertility.
Bisphenol A (BPA)
and phthalates are two types of manmade chemicals that have been getting the
attention of scientists, consumers, legislators and the media in recent months,
and their presence in products that we use in our daily lives, including those
omnipresent water bottles, has become controversial.
“They are all
around us,” says Tracey Woodruff, director of the Program on Reproductive Health
and the Environment at the
Bisphenol A is
used in hard, clear plastics (such as baby bottles and reusable water bottles)
and food and beverage can liners. The term phthalates refers to a family of
chemical compounds that are used to make plastics soft and flexible, and they
are used in medical tubing, IV bags, baby toys and pill coatings. Phthalates are
also used to carry scent in personal care products like lotions, cosmetics and
air fresheners.
In the body,
phthalates can interfere with hormonal functions, especially testosterone in
men and boys. They are thought to play a role in birth defects relating to
formation of the male reproductive system, as well as contributing to the
inability to produce a normal quantity and quality of sperm, which can lead to
reduced fertility in males. Bisphenol A has also been linked to poor semen quality in men; in women, BPA acts as a weak form of
estrogen that can cause early onset puberty in girls and affect reproductive
system health and function. It is also thought to have a trans-generational
effect, where the fetuses of pregnant women who are exposed to BPA can suffer
reproductive health and fertility problems after birth and as adults.
Infertility
affects approximately 1.2 million, or 2 percent of women of reproductive age in
the
“Our fates are all
intertwined in this [issue of exposure to fertility compromising chemicals],”
says Anne Adams, director of policy and programming for the American Fertility
Association (AFA). “This is not a woman’s issue. Women may take the lead
because this is what we do, but this is a universal issue.”
Many scientists
and environmental groups agree that these chemicals pose a real danger to the
public and human reproductive health, though many of the cited studies are
animal-based and experts agree that more research is needed to determine the
possible extent of these dangers.
Senator Sen. Frank
Lautenberg [D-NJ] introduced the Child, Worker and Consumer Safe Chemicals Act
to the United States Senate in July of 2005. The bill was co-sponsored by
Senators Jeffords, Boxer, Kerry, Corzine, Clinton and Kennedy. In his
introduction, Lautenberg said, “My bill will establish a safety standard that
each chemical on the market must meet. It shifts the burden for proving that chemicals
are safe from [the] EPA to the chemical manufacturers. Under my bill, the
manufacturers must provide the EPA with whatever data it needs to determine if
a chemical use meets the safety standard. And the bill strengthens EPA’s
authority to restrict the use of chemicals which fail to meet that standard….I
believe we have a sacred duty to protect the health of infants and children.”
The Child, Worker
and Consumer Safe Chemicals Act was endorsed by the American Public Health
Association and leading pediatricians at the time of its introduction. The bill
never became law, though, and was cleared from the Senate books at the close of
the 109th Congress.
The controversy surrounding BPA intensified in August of
2007, when a consensus statement by 38 scientific experts on BPA was
published. The statement warned
policymakers of the potential health risks posed by BPA exposure.
“The wide range of
adverse effects of low doses of BPA in laboratory animals exposed both during
development and in adulthood is a great cause for concern with regard to the
potential for similar adverse effects in humans,” the statement reads. “Recent
trends in human diseases relate to adverse effects observed in experimental
animals exposed to low doses of BPA. Specific examples include: the increase in
prostate and breast cancer, uro-genital abnormalities in male babies, a decline
in semen quality in men, early onset of puberty in girls” and other health
repercussions.
A September, 2007
Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) report also states that phthalates are
known to interfere with testosterone production and function. Most recently, an
article in the February, 2008 issue of the journal Pediatrics found that
phthalate exposure is widespread in infants and that the infants’ exposure to
lotion, powder and shampoo were significantly associated with increased urinary
concentrations of those phthalates.
Two months later,
California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger (R) signed a bill that requires any
children’s product manufactured, sold or distributed in
Woodruff and
“We need to
change…the way we respond to these things,”
Woodruff echoes
this point. “Since it’s not a
conventional contaminant, in our air, water or food, we don’t have a good
regulatory system [for it],” Woodruff says. “There’s no law that lets us go
ahead and get rid of it….We need to have a comprehensive way to address these
things.”
For more information:
The Environmental Working Group’s Skin Deep Cosmetics Safety
Database: www.cosmeticsdatabase.com
Association of Reproductive Health Professionals:
www.arhp.org
The Campaign for Safe Cosmetics: www.safecosmetics.org
Where These Chemicala Are Found and How toReduce Exposure
The Environmental
Working Group has compiled information about companies that have voluntarily
pledged to not use hazardous chemicals in their products and have rated the
safety of more than 25,000 personal care products. This tool can be used to
evaluate the products a consumer already owns or to help make decisions about
what brands to purchase.
“It’s not a call
to panic,”
PHTHALATES
• Medical tubing, IV bags, baby toys and pill coatings. Also used to convey scent in personal care products like lotions, cosmetics and air fresheners.
• Check ratings of personal care products on a consumer site, such as The Cosmetics Safety Database.
• Purchase toys made of wood, cloth or other natural materials.
• Consumers can buy
unscented products and those that are compliant with European Union (EU)
standards, as the EU has passed laws against some chemicals that the
BISPHENOL A (BPA)
• BPA is used in the lining of tin cans and in hard, clear plastic, like that used in baby bottles and reusable water bottles.
• Do not microwave food in plastic containers or with plastic wrap. Use a paper towel or a glass or ceramic lid to cover food.
Adams and other
experts advise using glass containers for food and beverages instead of plastic
when possible, especially when heating in a microwave. “If we buy an organic
product, but it's wrapped in plastic, [BPA] can still leach into the product,”
Published: April 06, 2008
Issue: 2008 Spring Green Issue